TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The HC set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s.119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for condonation of delay in filing returns. The Court held that authorities should adopt a liberal approach when considering pandemic-related hardships. The petitioner, a private limited company, had cited relocation to their native place during the pandemic and medical issues as reasons for delay. The Court emphasized that delay may be condoned where genuine hardship would result from refusal. The matter was remanded to the second respondent for fresh consideration, with the petitioner permitted to submit supporting documentation.
The HC set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s.119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for condonation of delay in filing returns. The Court held that authorities should adopt a liberal approach when considering pandemic-related hardships. The petitioner, a private limited company, had cited relocation to their native place during the pandemic and medical issues as reasons for delay. The Court emphasized that delay may be condoned where genuine hardship would result from refusal. The matter was remanded to the second respondent for fresh consideration, with the petitioner permitted to submit supporting documentation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.