Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT upheld disallowance of depreciation and additional depreciation claimed on alleged bogus purchases, as well as VAT-related additions. The Tribunal affirmed that the primary onus to establish return correctness rests with the taxpayer, citing precedent from Gauhati HC. The appellant merely provided invoices from B.N. Trading Company, which investigation confirmed were bogus. The taxpayer failed to demonstrate the supplier's location, and GST Department verification revealed no correlation between B.N. Trading's product line and goods allegedly purchased by the appellant. The Tribunal distinguished the case from SVD Resins & Plastics, finding the precedent inapplicable due to factual differences, and dismissed the appeals.
The ITAT upheld disallowance of depreciation and additional depreciation claimed on alleged bogus purchases, as well as VAT-related additions. The Tribunal affirmed that the primary onus to establish return correctness rests with the taxpayer, citing precedent from Gauhati HC. The appellant merely provided invoices from B.N. Trading Company, which investigation confirmed were bogus. The taxpayer failed to demonstrate the supplier's location, and GST Department verification revealed no correlation between B.N. Trading's product line and goods allegedly purchased by the appellant. The Tribunal distinguished the case from SVD Resins & Plastics, finding the precedent inapplicable due to factual differences, and dismissed the appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.