Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT ruled that denial of weighted deduction under s.35(2AB) does not prevent the assessee from claiming normal deduction for R&D expenditure under s.35(1)(i) and s.35(1)(iv). The Tribunal directed the AO to allow normal deduction for capital R&D expenditure under s.35(1)(iv) and delete the corresponding disallowance. Regarding s.80IC deduction for the Pantnagar plant, the ITAT held that profits reported in stand-alone audited financials were based on sound accounting principles, rejecting the AO's allegation of artificial profit creation. The Tribunal confirmed additional depreciation under s.32(1)(iia) for pollution control and energy-saving equipment as these qualified as "plant & machinery." Finally, following Sobha Developers Ltd., the ITAT held that s.14A disallowances cannot be added to book profit under s.115JB.
The ITAT ruled that denial of weighted deduction under s.35(2AB) does not prevent the assessee from claiming normal deduction for R&D expenditure under s.35(1)(i) and s.35(1)(iv). The Tribunal directed the AO to allow normal deduction for capital R&D expenditure under s.35(1)(iv) and delete the corresponding disallowance. Regarding s.80IC deduction for the Pantnagar plant, the ITAT held that profits reported in stand-alone audited financials were based on sound accounting principles, rejecting the AO's allegation of artificial profit creation. The Tribunal confirmed additional depreciation under s.32(1)(iia) for pollution control and energy-saving equipment as these qualified as "plant & machinery." Finally, following Sobha Developers Ltd., the ITAT held that s.14A disallowances cannot be added to book profit under s.115JB.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
