Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC addressed a petition challenging a show cause notice (SCN) issued by DRI Mumbai Zonal Unit on May 1, 2019, regarding jurisdiction under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. Following the Supreme Court's Canon-II judgment, the HC ruled that adjudication of the challenged SCN should be restored to the appropriate adjudicating authority as per paragraph 168(vi)(a) of that decision. The Court ordered that proceedings related to the May 1, 2019 SCN shall continue before the proper adjudicating authority in accordance with law. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC addressed a petition challenging a show cause notice (SCN) issued by DRI Mumbai Zonal Unit on May 1, 2019, regarding jurisdiction under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. Following the Supreme Court's Canon-II judgment, the HC ruled that adjudication of the challenged SCN should be restored to the appropriate adjudicating authority as per paragraph 168(vi)(a) of that decision. The Court ordered that proceedings related to the May 1, 2019 SCN shall continue before the proper adjudicating authority in accordance with law. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
