Concessional corporate tax option under section 115BAA survives procedural documentary lapses when statutory compliance and earlier exercise are estab...
Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
The HC addressed a petition challenging a show cause notice (SCN) issued by DRI Mumbai Zonal Unit on May 1, 2019, regarding jurisdiction under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. Following the Supreme Court's Canon-II judgment, the HC ruled that adjudication of the challenged SCN should be restored to the appropriate adjudicating authority as per paragraph 168(vi)(a) of that decision. The Court ordered that proceedings related to the May 1, 2019 SCN shall continue before the proper adjudicating authority in accordance with law. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC addressed a petition challenging a show cause notice (SCN) issued by DRI Mumbai Zonal Unit on May 1, 2019, regarding jurisdiction under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. Following the Supreme Court's Canon-II judgment, the HC ruled that adjudication of the challenged SCN should be restored to the appropriate adjudicating authority as per paragraph 168(vi)(a) of that decision. The Court ordered that proceedings related to the May 1, 2019 SCN shall continue before the proper adjudicating authority in accordance with law. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
