Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's rejection of the declared transaction value under Rule 12(2) of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, finding the appellant had suppressed their relationship with the overseas seller and misdeclared value. The Tribunal confirmed the classification of additional cutter head ladder under CTH 84314990 and jet pump system under CTH 84137097, rather than under CTH 89051000 as dredger parts. The denial of benefit under N/N.01/2011-CE was sustained. The demand under Section 28(4) was upheld, with penalties under Section 114A against the appellant company (modified to exclude interest) and Section 114AA against the Managing Director maintained, while penalties under Section 112(a) were set aside. The addendum to show-cause notice was deemed valid with no violation of natural justice principles.
The CESTAT upheld the Commissioner's rejection of the declared transaction value under Rule 12(2) of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, finding the appellant had suppressed their relationship with the overseas seller and misdeclared value. The Tribunal confirmed the classification of additional cutter head ladder under CTH 84314990 and jet pump system under CTH 84137097, rather than under CTH 89051000 as dredger parts. The denial of benefit under N/N.01/2011-CE was sustained. The demand under Section 28(4) was upheld, with penalties under Section 114A against the appellant company (modified to exclude interest) and Section 114AA against the Managing Director maintained, while penalties under Section 112(a) were set aside. The addendum to show-cause notice was deemed valid with no violation of natural justice principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
