Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding detained Mulberry Raw Silk. The goods were seized in 2016 on grounds that documentation was unavailable with premises caretaker. Revenue failed to issue show-cause notice within the extended six-month period under Section 110(2) of Customs Act as existed at seizure time. The tribunal rejected Revenue's reliance on 2018 amendments to justify actions taken in 2016. Consequently, no proceedings could be sustained against the respondent, who was entitled to unconditional release of the detained goods, return of personal bond, and bank guarantee.
CESTAT dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding detained Mulberry Raw Silk. The goods were seized in 2016 on grounds that documentation was unavailable with premises caretaker. Revenue failed to issue show-cause notice within the extended six-month period under Section 110(2) of Customs Act as existed at seizure time. The tribunal rejected Revenue's reliance on 2018 amendments to justify actions taken in 2016. Consequently, no proceedings could be sustained against the respondent, who was entitled to unconditional release of the detained goods, return of personal bond, and bank guarantee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.