Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT dismissed an appeal against admission of a Section 7 application filed by SBI for a default of 1049.72 Crore. The Tribunal found that debt and default were established facts, with the corporate debtor's accounts declared NPA on 26.07.2017 and a loan recall notice issued on 11.01.2019 demanding payment of 2078.04 Crore from consortium lenders. Despite multiple opportunities and interim orders that delayed the CIRP, the appellant failed to produce any accepted one-time settlement proposal. The Tribunal concluded that the corporate debtor was demonstrably unable to clear its debt, making this an appropriate case for insolvency proceedings to continue. The appellant's dilatory tactics and failure to reach settlement justified dismissal of the appeal.
The NCLAT dismissed an appeal against admission of a Section 7 application filed by SBI for a default of 1049.72 Crore. The Tribunal found that debt and default were established facts, with the corporate debtor's accounts declared NPA on 26.07.2017 and a loan recall notice issued on 11.01.2019 demanding payment of 2078.04 Crore from consortium lenders. Despite multiple opportunities and interim orders that delayed the CIRP, the appellant failed to produce any accepted one-time settlement proposal. The Tribunal concluded that the corporate debtor was demonstrably unable to clear its debt, making this an appropriate case for insolvency proceedings to continue. The appellant's dilatory tactics and failure to reach settlement justified dismissal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.