Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT set aside penalties of Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.6,00,000/- imposed on the appellant under FEMA. Despite allegations that the appellant assisted in preparing forged documents for M/s Prominent Exim's exports, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to establish contravention of Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA 1999. The appellant, working as a Custom Clearance Agent, merely processed export documentation and received commission (15% of the 40% DEPB received by Vinod Chitalia). The Tribunal concluded that receiving payment for processing export documents did not constitute a violation of the specified FEMA provisions, and accordingly allowed the appeal.
The AT set aside penalties of Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.6,00,000/- imposed on the appellant under FEMA. Despite allegations that the appellant assisted in preparing forged documents for M/s Prominent Exim's exports, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to establish contravention of Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA 1999. The appellant, working as a Custom Clearance Agent, merely processed export documentation and received commission (15% of the 40% DEPB received by Vinod Chitalia). The Tribunal concluded that receiving payment for processing export documents did not constitute a violation of the specified FEMA provisions, and accordingly allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
