Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration by respondent No.4, who had rejected petitioner's claim under various GST circulars solely on grounds of insufficient documentation. The court determined that petitioner should be given another opportunity to file additional pleadings and documents for reconsideration. Following reassessment, petitioner would be entitled to apply for benefits under the Amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the CGST Act, which the concerned respondent must consider in accordance with law. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the substantive merits of the rival contentions.
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration by respondent No.4, who had rejected petitioner's claim under various GST circulars solely on grounds of insufficient documentation. The court determined that petitioner should be given another opportunity to file additional pleadings and documents for reconsideration. Following reassessment, petitioner would be entitled to apply for benefits under the Amnesty scheme under Section 128A of the CGST Act, which the concerned respondent must consider in accordance with law. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the substantive merits of the rival contentions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
