Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice and suffered from non-application of mind. Despite the petitioner filing multiple replies on 28.10.2023, 21.11.2023, 29.11.2023, and 18.12.2023 to the Show Cause Notice, the authority failed to consider these submissions or even reference them in the final order. Additionally, no opportunity for personal hearing was provided to the petitioner before passing the order. The Court determined that this constituted a gross violation of natural justice principles and demonstrated failure to properly consider material evidence on record. The petition was accordingly disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
The HC held that the impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice and suffered from non-application of mind. Despite the petitioner filing multiple replies on 28.10.2023, 21.11.2023, 29.11.2023, and 18.12.2023 to the Show Cause Notice, the authority failed to consider these submissions or even reference them in the final order. Additionally, no opportunity for personal hearing was provided to the petitioner before passing the order. The Court determined that this constituted a gross violation of natural justice principles and demonstrated failure to properly consider material evidence on record. The petition was accordingly disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
