Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT quashed assessment orders for AYs 2014-15 and 2015-16 as time-barred, finding that the AO's reference to special audit under s.142(2A) was void ab initio since statutory conditions were not satisfied. Consequently, the extended time limit under s.153A was inapplicable, rendering the assessments invalid due to limitation. However, regarding additions under s.69 for unexplained payments, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision sustaining the AO's additions, noting the 4-year gap between alleged advance receipts and payments, and the appellant's failure to establish the source of payments from known income sources.
The ITAT quashed assessment orders for AYs 2014-15 and 2015-16 as time-barred, finding that the AO's reference to special audit under s.142(2A) was void ab initio since statutory conditions were not satisfied. Consequently, the extended time limit under s.153A was inapplicable, rendering the assessments invalid due to limitation. However, regarding additions under s.69 for unexplained payments, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision sustaining the AO's additions, noting the 4-year gap between alleged advance receipts and payments, and the appellant's failure to establish the source of payments from known income sources.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
