Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on three issues. First, regarding "Advance received from Customers," the Tribunal followed its earlier order and Supreme Court precedent in Taparia Tools Ltd., allowing deduction of the entire expenditure in the year of payment. Second, the ITAT permitted the security deposit written off to be allowed as business loss, considering the small amount relative to assessee's income and its nature as a revenue expense for tender participation. Finally, on transfer pricing adjustments for "commission received" from Associated Enterprises, the Tribunal found that after excluding dissimilar comparables, the operating profit/sales margin was 13.98%, noting that in subsequent years the TPO had accepted the commission as being at arm's length.
The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on three issues. First, regarding "Advance received from Customers," the Tribunal followed its earlier order and Supreme Court precedent in Taparia Tools Ltd., allowing deduction of the entire expenditure in the year of payment. Second, the ITAT permitted the security deposit written off to be allowed as business loss, considering the small amount relative to assessee's income and its nature as a revenue expense for tender participation. Finally, on transfer pricing adjustments for "commission received" from Associated Enterprises, the Tribunal found that after excluding dissimilar comparables, the operating profit/sales margin was 13.98%, noting that in subsequent years the TPO had accepted the commission as being at arm's length.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.