Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Tri directed the defreezing of the Corporate Debtor's demat account, which had been frozen due to non-compliance with SEBI LODR regulations. The Tribunal determined it had jurisdiction over the matter under Section 60(5) of IBC, finding a clear nexus between the dispute and the insolvency process. The Tribunal emphasized that continued freezing would impede the Liquidator's statutory duty to expeditiously liquidate assets and maximize recovery for stakeholders under Section 53(1) of IBC. The Tribunal held that IBC provisions have overriding effect over conflicting SEBI regulations when they obstruct the time-bound liquidation process, particularly when compliance by defaulting entities under liquidation is impossible.
The Tri directed the defreezing of the Corporate Debtor's demat account, which had been frozen due to non-compliance with SEBI LODR regulations. The Tribunal determined it had jurisdiction over the matter under Section 60(5) of IBC, finding a clear nexus between the dispute and the insolvency process. The Tribunal emphasized that continued freezing would impede the Liquidator's statutory duty to expeditiously liquidate assets and maximize recovery for stakeholders under Section 53(1) of IBC. The Tribunal held that IBC provisions have overriding effect over conflicting SEBI regulations when they obstruct the time-bound liquidation process, particularly when compliance by defaulting entities under liquidation is impossible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
