Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC affirmed that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, apply to proceedings under RBI Directions regarding fraud classification. Following Rajesh Agarwal (SC), the court held that borrowers must be afforded an opportunity of hearing before their accounts are classified as fraud, given the significant civil consequences that follow such classification. The court clarified that this principle requires not only allowing written representations but also providing personal hearings to affected parties. The impugned direction by the Single Judge mandating such hearings was upheld as proper implementation of natural justice principles. The Letters Patent Appeal challenging this direction was accordingly dismissed.
The HC affirmed that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, apply to proceedings under RBI Directions regarding fraud classification. Following Rajesh Agarwal (SC), the court held that borrowers must be afforded an opportunity of hearing before their accounts are classified as fraud, given the significant civil consequences that follow such classification. The court clarified that this principle requires not only allowing written representations but also providing personal hearings to affected parties. The impugned direction by the Single Judge mandating such hearings was upheld as proper implementation of natural justice principles. The Letters Patent Appeal challenging this direction was accordingly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.