Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The ITAT ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions outside the scope of limited scrutiny without obtaining mandatory permission from the PCIT/Pr.CIT to convert it to complete scrutiny. In this case, the AO improperly made a deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e) without such permission, violating binding CBDT circulars. The Tribunal held that since the addition pertained to an issue not included in the limited scrutiny parameters, it could not be sustained. The additional ground raised by the appellant was allowed, and the ITAT directed the deletion of the section 2(22)(e) addition, deciding in favor of the appellant.
The ITAT ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions outside the scope of limited scrutiny without obtaining mandatory permission from the PCIT/Pr.CIT to convert it to complete scrutiny. In this case, the AO improperly made a deemed dividend addition under section 2(22)(e) without such permission, violating binding CBDT circulars. The Tribunal held that since the addition pertained to an issue not included in the limited scrutiny parameters, it could not be sustained. The additional ground raised by the appellant was allowed, and the ITAT directed the deletion of the section 2(22)(e) addition, deciding in favor of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
