Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT rejected the TPO's approach of aggregating all international transactions for transfer pricing analysis. The Tribunal found that the TPO improperly combined payment and receipt of intra-group services (IGS) using the same OP/OC or OP/OR benchmarking metrics, despite the assessee maintaining separate "Craft division" accounts. The TPO failed to provide adequate opportunity for the assessee to substantiate its cost allocation basis between divisions. The matter was remanded to the TPO to conduct separate benchmarking for services rendered and received using appropriate methods (TNMM or CUP) under Rule 10D. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee for statistical purposes.
ITAT rejected the TPO's approach of aggregating all international transactions for transfer pricing analysis. The Tribunal found that the TPO improperly combined payment and receipt of intra-group services (IGS) using the same OP/OC or OP/OR benchmarking metrics, despite the assessee maintaining separate "Craft division" accounts. The TPO failed to provide adequate opportunity for the assessee to substantiate its cost allocation basis between divisions. The matter was remanded to the TPO to conduct separate benchmarking for services rendered and received using appropriate methods (TNMM or CUP) under Rule 10D. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.