Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of two additions made by the AO. First, interest earned from deposits was correctly held to be inextricably linked with setting up the plant, following Bokaro Steels Limited (1998), and thus not taxable as "Income from other sources." Second, the Tribunal confirmed deletion of share premium disallowance under s. 56(2)(viib), as the shares were issued to an existing shareholder whose identity and creditworthiness were established. The valuation of Rs. 12 per share was properly determined using the DCF method prescribed by RBI, and the AO had not disputed this valuation methodology. Appeal decided against Revenue.
ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of two additions made by the AO. First, interest earned from deposits was correctly held to be inextricably linked with setting up the plant, following Bokaro Steels Limited (1998), and thus not taxable as "Income from other sources." Second, the Tribunal confirmed deletion of share premium disallowance under s. 56(2)(viib), as the shares were issued to an existing shareholder whose identity and creditworthiness were established. The valuation of Rs. 12 per share was properly determined using the DCF method prescribed by RBI, and the AO had not disputed this valuation methodology. Appeal decided against Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
