Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT ruled that settlement deeds executed between the appellant and his brother constituted a family arrangement rather than a taxable transfer under s. 2(47) r.w.s 45/48 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in treating the simultaneous settlement deeds as an exchange transaction subject to capital gains tax. The ITAT determined that these settlement deeds, executed to prevent future disputes, were independent transactions properly characterized as settlements by stamp duty authorities. The Tribunal concluded that such family settlements fall within the exception provided under s. 47(iii), thereby negating capital gains tax liability. Relying on precedents from the SC and Madras HC regarding family arrangements, the ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal and deleted the capital gains addition.
The ITAT ruled that settlement deeds executed between the appellant and his brother constituted a family arrangement rather than a taxable transfer under s. 2(47) r.w.s 45/48 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in treating the simultaneous settlement deeds as an exchange transaction subject to capital gains tax. The ITAT determined that these settlement deeds, executed to prevent future disputes, were independent transactions properly characterized as settlements by stamp duty authorities. The Tribunal concluded that such family settlements fall within the exception provided under s. 47(iii), thereby negating capital gains tax liability. Relying on precedents from the SC and Madras HC regarding family arrangements, the ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal and deleted the capital gains addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
