Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT ruled that an assessee who stayed outside India for 210 days (182 days for employment and 28 days seeking employment) qualified as a non-resident under section 6 of the Act. The Tribunal determined that going abroad "for the purpose of employment" includes both actual employment and searching for employment. Following precedent from Suresh Nanda cases, the ITAT held that residential status depends solely on the number of days stayed in India, with non-resident status applying when stay is less than 182 days. The assessee's foreign income was therefore exempt from Indian taxation, as the Department failed to prove the foreign visits were for purposes other than employment. The appeal was allowed and the addition deleted.
The ITAT ruled that an assessee who stayed outside India for 210 days (182 days for employment and 28 days seeking employment) qualified as a non-resident under section 6 of the Act. The Tribunal determined that going abroad "for the purpose of employment" includes both actual employment and searching for employment. Following precedent from Suresh Nanda cases, the ITAT held that residential status depends solely on the number of days stayed in India, with non-resident status applying when stay is less than 182 days. The assessee's foreign income was therefore exempt from Indian taxation, as the Department failed to prove the foreign visits were for purposes other than employment. The appeal was allowed and the addition deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.