Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
HC held that Respondents must deposit USD 1 million (converted to INR at applicable exchange rates) plus 12% statutory interest within two weeks. The court found Respondents breached their obligation to allot shares to Petitioner after receiving investment funds, triggering statutory refund requirements under Companies Act. Petitioner established a strong prima facie case that Respondents improperly benefited from his funds used to discharge SIDBI debt, releasing mortgaged properties and personal guarantees without fulfilling contractual obligations. The interim relief will remain in effect until arbitration concludes, protecting Petitioner's interests under s.9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
HC held that Respondents must deposit USD 1 million (converted to INR at applicable exchange rates) plus 12% statutory interest within two weeks. The court found Respondents breached their obligation to allot shares to Petitioner after receiving investment funds, triggering statutory refund requirements under Companies Act. Petitioner established a strong prima facie case that Respondents improperly benefited from his funds used to discharge SIDBI debt, releasing mortgaged properties and personal guarantees without fulfilling contractual obligations. The interim relief will remain in effect until arbitration concludes, protecting Petitioner's interests under s.9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
