Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
In this NCLAT decision, the Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction under IBC Section 60(5)(c) to adjudicate maintenance disputes during CIRP. The case involved Supernova Apartment Owners Association seeking to take over maintenance from YG Estates, an agency appointed by the corporate debtor. The Tribunal ruled that since CIRP had commenced against the corporate debtor, all assets including the Supernova project fell under IRP supervision. The registered association under the UP Apartment Act 2010 has statutory rights to assume maintenance responsibilities. YG Estates, merely an agency of the corporate debtor, cannot resist handover to a properly registered association. The NCLAT directed YG Estates to transfer maintenance to the association within seven days.
In this NCLAT decision, the Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction under IBC Section 60(5)(c) to adjudicate maintenance disputes during CIRP. The case involved Supernova Apartment Owners Association seeking to take over maintenance from YG Estates, an agency appointed by the corporate debtor. The Tribunal ruled that since CIRP had commenced against the corporate debtor, all assets including the Supernova project fell under IRP supervision. The registered association under the UP Apartment Act 2010 has statutory rights to assume maintenance responsibilities. YG Estates, merely an agency of the corporate debtor, cannot resist handover to a properly registered association. The NCLAT directed YG Estates to transfer maintenance to the association within seven days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.