Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal concerning alleged abuse of dominant position under Sections 3(4) and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Appellant failed to disclose that their retailer tier status had been restored on 23.06.2021, prior to filing information on 01.07.2021, yet continued seeking reinstatement of the same status in their prayer. The tribunal determined this constituted "unclean hands" as the Appellant submitted false affidavits and concealed material facts. The Commission found the retailer tier downgrade resulted from consistently reduced offtake by the Appellant rather than anti-competitive conduct. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, with the investigation process deemed fair.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal concerning alleged abuse of dominant position under Sections 3(4) and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Appellant failed to disclose that their retailer tier status had been restored on 23.06.2021, prior to filing information on 01.07.2021, yet continued seeking reinstatement of the same status in their prayer. The tribunal determined this constituted "unclean hands" as the Appellant submitted false affidavits and concealed material facts. The Commission found the retailer tier downgrade resulted from consistently reduced offtake by the Appellant rather than anti-competitive conduct. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, with the investigation process deemed fair.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
