TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal concerning alleged abuse of dominant position under Sections 3(4) and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Appellant failed to disclose that their retailer tier status had been restored on 23.06.2021, prior to filing information on 01.07.2021, yet continued seeking reinstatement of the same status in their prayer. The tribunal determined this constituted "unclean hands" as the Appellant submitted false affidavits and concealed material facts. The Commission found the retailer tier downgrade resulted from consistently reduced offtake by the Appellant rather than anti-competitive conduct. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, with the investigation process deemed fair.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal concerning alleged abuse of dominant position under Sections 3(4) and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. The Appellant failed to disclose that their retailer tier status had been restored on 23.06.2021, prior to filing information on 01.07.2021, yet continued seeking reinstatement of the same status in their prayer. The tribunal determined this constituted "unclean hands" as the Appellant submitted false affidavits and concealed material facts. The Commission found the retailer tier downgrade resulted from consistently reduced offtake by the Appellant rather than anti-competitive conduct. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, with the investigation process deemed fair.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
