Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC quashed the ECIR and summons issued to the petitioner under PMLA, finding no evidence of money laundering. The court determined that sites granted as compensation, which had already been surrendered and allotment canceled, could not constitute "proceeds of crime" as defined under Section 3 PMLA. Following precedent established in NATESHA that site allotments cannot be proceeds of crime, the court found the petitioner was not in possession, enjoyment, or usage of any proceeds of crime. While the ED could pursue investigations against others implicated in MUDA corruption, the petitioner could not be prosecuted under PMLA, though this ruling does not affect the predicate offense proceedings in Crime No. 11/2024.
HC quashed the ECIR and summons issued to the petitioner under PMLA, finding no evidence of money laundering. The court determined that sites granted as compensation, which had already been surrendered and allotment canceled, could not constitute "proceeds of crime" as defined under Section 3 PMLA. Following precedent established in NATESHA that site allotments cannot be proceeds of crime, the court found the petitioner was not in possession, enjoyment, or usage of any proceeds of crime. While the ED could pursue investigations against others implicated in MUDA corruption, the petitioner could not be prosecuted under PMLA, though this ruling does not affect the predicate offense proceedings in Crime No. 11/2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
