Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging an assessment order on grounds of limitation and absence of Digital Identification Number (DIN). The court held that limitation involves mixed questions of fact and law unsuitable for summary determination on affidavits alone. Regarding the DIN issue, the court noted that the Supreme Court had stayed a similar ruling in the Tata Medical Center Trust case. Following Bank of Baroda v. Farooq Ali Khan, the HC emphasized that statutory tribunals are constituted to determine questions of law and fact, and courts should not substitute themselves as decision-making authorities during judicial review. The petition was dismissed as non-maintainable since alternative and efficacious remedies remained available to the petitioner.
The HC declined to entertain a writ petition challenging an assessment order on grounds of limitation and absence of Digital Identification Number (DIN). The court held that limitation involves mixed questions of fact and law unsuitable for summary determination on affidavits alone. Regarding the DIN issue, the court noted that the Supreme Court had stayed a similar ruling in the Tata Medical Center Trust case. Following Bank of Baroda v. Farooq Ali Khan, the HC emphasized that statutory tribunals are constituted to determine questions of law and fact, and courts should not substitute themselves as decision-making authorities during judicial review. The petition was dismissed as non-maintainable since alternative and efficacious remedies remained available to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
