Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC quashed and set aside a show-cause notice issued by Bank of India based on a Forensic Audit Report (FAR) prepared by BDO India LLP, as the petitioner was not provided a copy of the report, violating principles of natural justice. The Bank was permitted to withdraw the impugned notice and all consequential proceedings/actions, with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner retains the right to raise all objections in response to any fresh show-cause notice, including challenging the partiality of the FAR. The Bank was directed to communicate the withdrawal to the petitioner within 72 hours.
The HC quashed and set aside a show-cause notice issued by Bank of India based on a Forensic Audit Report (FAR) prepared by BDO India LLP, as the petitioner was not provided a copy of the report, violating principles of natural justice. The Bank was permitted to withdraw the impugned notice and all consequential proceedings/actions, with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner retains the right to raise all objections in response to any fresh show-cause notice, including challenging the partiality of the FAR. The Bank was directed to communicate the withdrawal to the petitioner within 72 hours.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.