Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a case involving dishonored cheques, the SC held that proceedings against the appellant should be quashed where the cause of action under Section 138 of the NI Act arose after a moratorium was issued under Section 14 of the IBC. The Court determined that when the demand notice was issued, the appellant lacked capacity to fulfill payment obligations as he was suspended as director after the IRP's appointment. The appellant could not access corporate bank accounts as they operated under IRP instructions pursuant to Section 17 of the IBC. The SC set aside both the HC's order and the summoning order, ruling that Section 482 of the CrPC should have been exercised to quash proceedings against the appellant.
In a case involving dishonored cheques, the SC held that proceedings against the appellant should be quashed where the cause of action under Section 138 of the NI Act arose after a moratorium was issued under Section 14 of the IBC. The Court determined that when the demand notice was issued, the appellant lacked capacity to fulfill payment obligations as he was suspended as director after the IRP's appointment. The appellant could not access corporate bank accounts as they operated under IRP instructions pursuant to Section 17 of the IBC. The SC set aside both the HC's order and the summoning order, ruling that Section 482 of the CrPC should have been exercised to quash proceedings against the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.