Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT deleted the penalty imposed under Section 43 of the Black Money Act for failure to disclose foreign assets in the income tax return. The Tribunal found that since no fresh investments were made during the assessment year and the explanation regarding source of previous investments was accepted, the non-disclosure constituted a bonafide mistake rather than an attempt to evade the Act. The Tribunal held that while Sections 3, 10, and 43 of the BMA may be independent provisions, they must be read together to determine legislative intent. Following Ocean Diving (ITAT Mumbai) and Mylan Laboratories (Telangana HC), the appeal was allowed.
ITAT deleted the penalty imposed under Section 43 of the Black Money Act for failure to disclose foreign assets in the income tax return. The Tribunal found that since no fresh investments were made during the assessment year and the explanation regarding source of previous investments was accepted, the non-disclosure constituted a bonafide mistake rather than an attempt to evade the Act. The Tribunal held that while Sections 3, 10, and 43 of the BMA may be independent provisions, they must be read together to determine legislative intent. Following Ocean Diving (ITAT Mumbai) and Mylan Laboratories (Telangana HC), the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.