Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC recalled its earlier order and restored the writ petition, acknowledging that the petitioner should not be excluded from proceedings involving circular trading adjudication. The court recognized that circular trading issues must be decided with all five assessees participating collectively. The petitioner sought restoration to challenge the adjudicating authority's final order alongside four other assessees. The court determined that changed circumstances warranted restoration of the petition to its original number (8015/2024), thereby allowing the petitioner to join the collective proceedings. The review petition was accordingly disposed of, with the court's 17.12.2024 order being formally recalled.
The HC recalled its earlier order and restored the writ petition, acknowledging that the petitioner should not be excluded from proceedings involving circular trading adjudication. The court recognized that circular trading issues must be decided with all five assessees participating collectively. The petitioner sought restoration to challenge the adjudicating authority's final order alongside four other assessees. The court determined that changed circumstances warranted restoration of the petition to its original number (8015/2024), thereby allowing the petitioner to join the collective proceedings. The review petition was accordingly disposed of, with the court's 17.12.2024 order being formally recalled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
