Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC recalled its earlier order and restored the writ petition, acknowledging that the petitioner should not be excluded from proceedings involving circular trading adjudication. The court recognized that circular trading issues must be decided with all five assessees participating collectively. The petitioner sought restoration to challenge the adjudicating authority's final order alongside four other assessees. The court determined that changed circumstances warranted restoration of the petition to its original number (8015/2024), thereby allowing the petitioner to join the collective proceedings. The review petition was accordingly disposed of, with the court's 17.12.2024 order being formally recalled.
The HC recalled its earlier order and restored the writ petition, acknowledging that the petitioner should not be excluded from proceedings involving circular trading adjudication. The court recognized that circular trading issues must be decided with all five assessees participating collectively. The petitioner sought restoration to challenge the adjudicating authority's final order alongside four other assessees. The court determined that changed circumstances warranted restoration of the petition to its original number (8015/2024), thereby allowing the petitioner to join the collective proceedings. The review petition was accordingly disposed of, with the court's 17.12.2024 order being formally recalled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
