Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed appellant's appeal for release of 53 kgs of gold seized by DRI. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's order lacked evidentiary basis, particularly regarding the allegation that premises lacked fully mechanized jewelry manufacturing equipment. The panchanama clearly documented two jewelry manufacturing machines on the fifth floor, which the Commissioner erroneously assumed were not fully mechanized without proper verification. The gold was detained on 17.08.2020, preventing fulfillment of export obligations under the Advance Authorization. The Delhi HC had previously ruled that appellant could apply for extension/revalidation of the Advance Authorization License after adjudication of the show cause notice, acknowledging the appellant was prevented from exporting due to the seizure.
CESTAT allowed appellant's appeal for release of 53 kgs of gold seized by DRI. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner's order lacked evidentiary basis, particularly regarding the allegation that premises lacked fully mechanized jewelry manufacturing equipment. The panchanama clearly documented two jewelry manufacturing machines on the fifth floor, which the Commissioner erroneously assumed were not fully mechanized without proper verification. The gold was detained on 17.08.2020, preventing fulfillment of export obligations under the Advance Authorization. The Delhi HC had previously ruled that appellant could apply for extension/revalidation of the Advance Authorization License after adjudication of the show cause notice, acknowledging the appellant was prevented from exporting due to the seizure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
