Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC set aside the assessment order due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN), ruling it non-est and invalid. Following precedents established in Pradeep Goyal v. Union of India and M/s. Cluster Enterprises v. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner, along with CBIC Circular No.128/47/2019-GST, the court determined that proceedings lacking a DIN number cannot be sustained. The petition was disposed of with the impugned proceedings dated 18.07.2023 set aside, granting liberty to the respondent to conduct fresh assessment after proper notice and assigning a DIN number to the order.
The HC set aside the assessment order due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN), ruling it non-est and invalid. Following precedents established in Pradeep Goyal v. Union of India and M/s. Cluster Enterprises v. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner, along with CBIC Circular No.128/47/2019-GST, the court determined that proceedings lacking a DIN number cannot be sustained. The petition was disposed of with the impugned proceedings dated 18.07.2023 set aside, granting liberty to the respondent to conduct fresh assessment after proper notice and assigning a DIN number to the order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
