Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the assessment order due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN), ruling it non-est and invalid. Following precedents established in Pradeep Goyal v. Union of India and M/s. Cluster Enterprises v. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner, along with CBIC Circular No.128/47/2019-GST, the court determined that proceedings lacking a DIN number cannot be sustained. The petition was disposed of with the impugned proceedings dated 18.07.2023 set aside, granting liberty to the respondent to conduct fresh assessment after proper notice and assigning a DIN number to the order.
The HC set aside the assessment order due to the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN), ruling it non-est and invalid. Following precedents established in Pradeep Goyal v. Union of India and M/s. Cluster Enterprises v. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner, along with CBIC Circular No.128/47/2019-GST, the court determined that proceedings lacking a DIN number cannot be sustained. The petition was disposed of with the impugned proceedings dated 18.07.2023 set aside, granting liberty to the respondent to conduct fresh assessment after proper notice and assigning a DIN number to the order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
