Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC ruled that once the petitioner regularized their export obligation under the Amnesty Scheme by paying the entire duty forgone (Rs. 50,23,802/-) plus interest (Rs. 13,35,689/-) under the EPCG Scheme, and obtained an export obligation discharge certificate, no additional penalties could be imposed. The Court reasoned that payment of the full duty amount with interest effectively meant the petitioner had not availed of the EPCG Scheme benefits, thereby discharging the export obligation. Consequently, the fine imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act in lieu of confiscation under Section 111(o) was held unrecoverable, as the same default could not be subject to multiple penalties once regularized through the Amnesty Scheme. Petition allowed.
The HC ruled that once the petitioner regularized their export obligation under the Amnesty Scheme by paying the entire duty forgone (Rs. 50,23,802/-) plus interest (Rs. 13,35,689/-) under the EPCG Scheme, and obtained an export obligation discharge certificate, no additional penalties could be imposed. The Court reasoned that payment of the full duty amount with interest effectively meant the petitioner had not availed of the EPCG Scheme benefits, thereby discharging the export obligation. Consequently, the fine imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act in lieu of confiscation under Section 111(o) was held unrecoverable, as the same default could not be subject to multiple penalties once regularized through the Amnesty Scheme. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
