Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the seized cash was properly assessed as unaccounted money under section 69A read with section 115BBE. Despite the appellant's declaration during search operations that the money represented commission income, the court found this mere assertion insufficient without satisfactory explanation supported by material evidence. The appellants' failure to respond to show cause notices demonstrated indifference. The court emphasized that even when an explanation is provided, it must satisfy the Assessing Officer as required by section 69A. Following Shashi Garg, the court affirmed that the burden to explain cash sources rests with the assessee, and this burden was not discharged. The appeal was dismissed.
The HC held that the seized cash was properly assessed as unaccounted money under section 69A read with section 115BBE. Despite the appellant's declaration during search operations that the money represented commission income, the court found this mere assertion insufficient without satisfactory explanation supported by material evidence. The appellants' failure to respond to show cause notices demonstrated indifference. The court emphasized that even when an explanation is provided, it must satisfy the Assessing Officer as required by section 69A. Following Shashi Garg, the court affirmed that the burden to explain cash sources rests with the assessee, and this burden was not discharged. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
