Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Alternative statutory remedy bars writ interference in GST proceedings absent exceptional grounds of natural justice or jurisdictional defect.
    Bail in GST fraud prosecution granted where evidence was documentary, custody was prolonged, and trial delay was likely.
    Preferential location charges form part of composite construction supply and cannot be taxed separately under GST.
    GST registration cancellation requires a speaking order; failure to record reasons renders the cancellation illegal and unsustainable.
    Composite assessment orders spanning multiple tax periods are invalid and must be proceeded with year-wise.
    Anti-profiteering delay and GST-inclusive profiteered amount upheld, with interest and prospective penalty on unrepassed ITC benefit.
    Refund adjustment against disputed tax demand barred during appeal where substantial deposit had already been made.
    Reassessment notices against a deceased assessee are invalid unless proceedings are brought against legal representatives under the statute.
    Aggregated TNMM benchmarking upheld where interlinked international transactions were tested together and no substantial question of law arose.
    Convertible debentures treated as equity, no transition amount under MAT, and Rule 8D disallowance failed for lack of satisfaction.
    Inoperative PAN triggers higher TDS, but liability may be avoided if the seller disclosed the transaction and paid due tax.
    Rectification of apparent error allowed where notional cost substitution for section 80-IB(10) deduction was held legally impermissible.
    Transfer-linked expenses and acquisition cost rules: travel claims remanded, deposits and loan interest allowed in capital gains computation.
    Best judgment assessment must be based on fair estimation; arbitrary profit rate rejected and income recomputed at 7 per cent.
    Discretionary penalty for foreign asset non-disclosure rejected where omission was bona fide and funds were fully disclosed.
    Tenancy rights surrender receipts remain capital in nature and cannot be taxed under other sources despite acquisition-cost disputes.
    Artificial volume and price rigging justified commission income estimation at 5%, restoring the assessment addition.
    Debatable deduction claim under section 80IB(10) could not justify penalty for inaccurate particulars.
    Depreciable asset gains remain long-term for tax-rate purposes while section 50 governs only computation and written down value
    Capital receipt treatment for settlement compensation: Tribunal excludes payment for giving up a right to sue from taxability.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The HC quashed the retrospective cancellation of GST...

GST Registration Cannot Be Retrospectively Canceled Without Proper Notice and Evidence Under Section 29 of CGST Act

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST March 15, 2025 Case Laws HC
The HC quashed the retrospective cancellation of GST registration under SS29 of CGST Act, 2017, finding procedural violations. Neither the SCN nor final order provided material evidence supporting the allegation under SS29(2)(e), nor did they notify the petitioner of intended retrospective cancellation. This procedural defect alone invalidated the action. The court clarified that authorities may continue proceedings regarding alleged fraudulent registration, provided the petitioner receives proper notice with supporting evidence. On time limitation, the court referenced Addichem Speciality LLP, confirming that condonation of delay depends on statutory provisions governing the remedy. The March 20, 2024 order was quashed insofar as it retrospectively canceled registration.

Topics

Acts Income Tax