Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT quashed penalty proceedings under section 271D imposed on the assessee for accepting cash loans of Rs. 61,50,000/- in violation of section 269SS. The Tribunal held that the show cause notice dated 30.03.2021 required penalty order completion by 30.09.2021, which fell outside the Taxation and Other Laws Act (TOLA) period (20.03.2020 to 31.03.2021). Consequently, the CBDT notification dated 17.09.2021 did not extend the due date for passing the penalty order in this case. Following precedents in Mahesh Wood Products Pvt. Ltd. and Shri Subramaniam Thanu, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to quash the penalty order due to limitation issues.
The ITAT quashed penalty proceedings under section 271D imposed on the assessee for accepting cash loans of Rs. 61,50,000/- in violation of section 269SS. The Tribunal held that the show cause notice dated 30.03.2021 required penalty order completion by 30.09.2021, which fell outside the Taxation and Other Laws Act (TOLA) period (20.03.2020 to 31.03.2021). Consequently, the CBDT notification dated 17.09.2021 did not extend the due date for passing the penalty order in this case. Following precedents in Mahesh Wood Products Pvt. Ltd. and Shri Subramaniam Thanu, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to quash the penalty order due to limitation issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
