Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT reversed the addition made by AO under section 69 for unexplained investment. The addition was based solely on an excel sheet found at a third party's premises, which allegedly showed cash loans advanced by the appellant. The Tribunal held that the excel sheet alone was insufficient evidence as it was neither authored by nor found in possession of the appellant. Without corroborative evidence establishing the appellant's connection to the alleged transactions, the addition was unsustainable. Following precedents in Appu Direct Pvt Ltd and Sant Lal, ITAT affirmed that liability cannot be fastened based solely on third-party materials without supporting evidence. The CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition was upheld.
ITAT reversed the addition made by AO under section 69 for unexplained investment. The addition was based solely on an excel sheet found at a third party's premises, which allegedly showed cash loans advanced by the appellant. The Tribunal held that the excel sheet alone was insufficient evidence as it was neither authored by nor found in possession of the appellant. Without corroborative evidence establishing the appellant's connection to the alleged transactions, the addition was unsustainable. Following precedents in Appu Direct Pvt Ltd and Sant Lal, ITAT affirmed that liability cannot be fastened based solely on third-party materials without supporting evidence. The CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
