Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The CESTAT ruled that lithium-ion batteries are correctly classified under S. No. 376AA of Schedule III to Notification No. 01/2017-IT (Rate), as amended by Notification No. 19/2018-IT (Rate), attracting 18% IGST rather than 12%. The Tribunal applied the cardinal principle that when statutory language is plain and unambiguous, courts must give effect to the words as written without implication or intendment. However, the demand for interest was set aside following Bombay HC precedent in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Union of India, which held that absent specific statutory provisions for interest levy under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (prior to its amendment on August 16, 2024), such interest cannot be charged.
The CESTAT ruled that lithium-ion batteries are correctly classified under S. No. 376AA of Schedule III to Notification No. 01/2017-IT (Rate), as amended by Notification No. 19/2018-IT (Rate), attracting 18% IGST rather than 12%. The Tribunal applied the cardinal principle that when statutory language is plain and unambiguous, courts must give effect to the words as written without implication or intendment. However, the demand for interest was set aside following Bombay HC precedent in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Union of India, which held that absent specific statutory provisions for interest levy under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (prior to its amendment on August 16, 2024), such interest cannot be charged.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.