Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The CESTAT ruled that lithium-ion batteries are correctly classified under S. No. 376AA of Schedule III to Notification No. 01/2017-IT (Rate), as amended by Notification No. 19/2018-IT (Rate), attracting 18% IGST rather than 12%. The Tribunal applied the cardinal principle that when statutory language is plain and unambiguous, courts must give effect to the words as written without implication or intendment. However, the demand for interest was set aside following Bombay HC precedent in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Union of India, which held that absent specific statutory provisions for interest levy under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (prior to its amendment on August 16, 2024), such interest cannot be charged.
The CESTAT ruled that lithium-ion batteries are correctly classified under S. No. 376AA of Schedule III to Notification No. 01/2017-IT (Rate), as amended by Notification No. 19/2018-IT (Rate), attracting 18% IGST rather than 12%. The Tribunal applied the cardinal principle that when statutory language is plain and unambiguous, courts must give effect to the words as written without implication or intendment. However, the demand for interest was set aside following Bombay HC precedent in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Union of India, which held that absent specific statutory provisions for interest levy under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (prior to its amendment on August 16, 2024), such interest cannot be charged.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.