Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The CESTAT allowed an appeal against confiscation of 850.39 grams of gold seized from a person in a town seizure case. The tribunal held that Section 113 of the Customs Act was inapplicable as there were no allegations of attempted export. While statements recorded under Section 108 are admissible evidence, they cannot be treated as conclusive proof without scrutiny. The tribunal found that the Revenue failed to establish reasonable belief that the gold was smuggled, while the appellants successfully demonstrated that the irregular gold pieces were produced by melting old jewelry. The tribunal determined that absolute confiscation and penalties were unjustified under these circumstances.
The CESTAT allowed an appeal against confiscation of 850.39 grams of gold seized from a person in a town seizure case. The tribunal held that Section 113 of the Customs Act was inapplicable as there were no allegations of attempted export. While statements recorded under Section 108 are admissible evidence, they cannot be treated as conclusive proof without scrutiny. The tribunal found that the Revenue failed to establish reasonable belief that the gold was smuggled, while the appellants successfully demonstrated that the irregular gold pieces were produced by melting old jewelry. The tribunal determined that absolute confiscation and penalties were unjustified under these circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
