Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC recalled its order approving a compromise between a bank and Savannah regarding the assignment of Shaila Clubs' loan. The Court determined the compromise was unlawful as it violated RBI Directives of 2021, which prohibit transfer of loan accounts to ineligible transferees. Savannah, not being a recognized transferee under RBI guidelines, could not legally acquire the loan. The Court rejected arguments regarding delay in filing the application for recall, holding that when a compromise is unlawful, technical grounds cannot prevent the Court from exercising its inherent power to recall orders. The Court restored the original petition, finding that allowing the unlawful compromise would frustrate RBI's regulatory objectives and improperly affect Shaila Clubs' rights without their consent.
The HC recalled its order approving a compromise between a bank and Savannah regarding the assignment of Shaila Clubs' loan. The Court determined the compromise was unlawful as it violated RBI Directives of 2021, which prohibit transfer of loan accounts to ineligible transferees. Savannah, not being a recognized transferee under RBI guidelines, could not legally acquire the loan. The Court rejected arguments regarding delay in filing the application for recall, holding that when a compromise is unlawful, technical grounds cannot prevent the Court from exercising its inherent power to recall orders. The Court restored the original petition, finding that allowing the unlawful compromise would frustrate RBI's regulatory objectives and improperly affect Shaila Clubs' rights without their consent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
