Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging a scheme of arrangement between ICICI Bank and ICICI Securities. The Tribunal found that SEBI's relaxation from reverse book building requirements was within its regulatory powers under Regulation 42 of the Delisting Regulations. The valuation complied with Regulation 37(2)(j), meeting the minimum 60-day VWAP requirement. The court affirmed that valuation determinations should be left to accounting experts. ICICI Bank's shareholder outreach did not constitute undue influence, and disclosures in the explanatory statement were deemed sufficient. The appellant lacked standing to object under Section 230(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, and failed to demonstrate any procedural illegality or prejudice to public shareholders.
The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging a scheme of arrangement between ICICI Bank and ICICI Securities. The Tribunal found that SEBI's relaxation from reverse book building requirements was within its regulatory powers under Regulation 42 of the Delisting Regulations. The valuation complied with Regulation 37(2)(j), meeting the minimum 60-day VWAP requirement. The court affirmed that valuation determinations should be left to accounting experts. ICICI Bank's shareholder outreach did not constitute undue influence, and disclosures in the explanatory statement were deemed sufficient. The appellant lacked standing to object under Section 230(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, and failed to demonstrate any procedural illegality or prejudice to public shareholders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
