Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The HC set aside the impugned Order-in-Original due to procedural irregularities that violated principles of natural justice. The order had incorrectly proceeded on the premise that the petitioner had not filed any reply to the Show Cause Notices, when in fact a response had been submitted. This factual error constituted a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, as the adjudicating authority failed to consider the petitioner's submissions before reaching its determination. The writ petition was accordingly allowed, invalidating the original order.
The HC set aside the impugned Order-in-Original due to procedural irregularities that violated principles of natural justice. The order had incorrectly proceeded on the premise that the petitioner had not filed any reply to the Show Cause Notices, when in fact a response had been submitted. This factual error constituted a fundamental breach of procedural fairness, as the adjudicating authority failed to consider the petitioner's submissions before reaching its determination. The writ petition was accordingly allowed, invalidating the original order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
