Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT overturned an addition made under Section 69 for unexplained investment. The AO had computed an 8% shortfall of profit based on bank deposits and total turnover under Section 44AD. The Tribunal found that the assessee had properly filed returns on presumptive basis, disclosed all bank statements from three banks, and reported business receipts of 39,48,887/- as the source of investment. Since payments were made from disclosed bank accounts that were available to the AO during assessment, no addition under Section 69 was sustainable. The AO also failed to invoke Section 56(2)(vii). The assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT overturned an addition made under Section 69 for unexplained investment. The AO had computed an 8% shortfall of profit based on bank deposits and total turnover under Section 44AD. The Tribunal found that the assessee had properly filed returns on presumptive basis, disclosed all bank statements from three banks, and reported business receipts of 39,48,887/- as the source of investment. Since payments were made from disclosed bank accounts that were available to the AO during assessment, no addition under Section 69 was sustainable. The AO also failed to invoke Section 56(2)(vii). The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.