Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 for five assessment years, finding the AO's reopening was based on mere change of opinion rather than new tangible material. The Tribunal noted that information regarding profits from sales made on behalf of UBL had been disclosed in Notes to Accounts during regular assessment proceedings. The reopening was primarily influenced by audit objections and the Chamundi Winery case, demonstrating the AO lacked independent judgment. On merits, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A)'s determination that the appellant functioned solely as a contract manufacturer for UBL, entitled only to reimbursement of expenses and bottling charges, with UBL being the de facto earner of income from manufacture and sale of liquor.
The ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 for five assessment years, finding the AO's reopening was based on mere change of opinion rather than new tangible material. The Tribunal noted that information regarding profits from sales made on behalf of UBL had been disclosed in Notes to Accounts during regular assessment proceedings. The reopening was primarily influenced by audit objections and the Chamundi Winery case, demonstrating the AO lacked independent judgment. On merits, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A)'s determination that the appellant functioned solely as a contract manufacturer for UBL, entitled only to reimbursement of expenses and bottling charges, with UBL being the de facto earner of income from manufacture and sale of liquor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
