Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the block assessment order due to improper assumption of jurisdiction under section 158BD. The Tribunal found that although the satisfaction was recorded within a reasonable timeframe after completion of the searched person's assessment (within 1 month and 10 days), the AO failed to demonstrate proper mental application in the satisfaction note. The satisfaction merely contained casual references to seized documents without revealing the requisite dispassionate thought process. Consequently, the notice issued under section 158BC read with 158BD and the subsequent assessment order were held legally unsustainable due to the jurisdictional defect in the satisfaction recorded by the AO.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the block assessment order due to improper assumption of jurisdiction under section 158BD. The Tribunal found that although the satisfaction was recorded within a reasonable timeframe after completion of the searched person's assessment (within 1 month and 10 days), the AO failed to demonstrate proper mental application in the satisfaction note. The satisfaction merely contained casual references to seized documents without revealing the requisite dispassionate thought process. Consequently, the notice issued under section 158BC read with 158BD and the subsequent assessment order were held legally unsustainable due to the jurisdictional defect in the satisfaction recorded by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.