Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition by remanding the matter back to the stage of filing objections to the show cause notice issued under Section 73 of GST Act. Despite the petitioner's appeal being rejected solely on grounds of delay, the Court determined it retained jurisdiction to examine the ex-parte order. The Court found that the petitioner's inability to participate in the original proceedings was justified by documented medical evidence of heart ailment requiring surgery. Following precedent established in M/S. CHAMARAJNAGAR TALUK MSPC, the Court held that the petitioner deserved an opportunity to participate in the proceedings by filing objections to the show cause notice.
The HC allowed the petition by remanding the matter back to the stage of filing objections to the show cause notice issued under Section 73 of GST Act. Despite the petitioner's appeal being rejected solely on grounds of delay, the Court determined it retained jurisdiction to examine the ex-parte order. The Court found that the petitioner's inability to participate in the original proceedings was justified by documented medical evidence of heart ailment requiring surgery. Following precedent established in M/S. CHAMARAJNAGAR TALUK MSPC, the Court held that the petitioner deserved an opportunity to participate in the proceedings by filing objections to the show cause notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.