Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The HC upheld the ITAT's deletion of addition under section 56(2)(viib) regarding share premium collected by a closely held company. The court found that lower authorities improperly rejected the DCF valuation method without examining its details or calling for additional information. The rejection was based on objective satisfaction rather than subjective assessment of case facts. Following Town Essential Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore, 2021), the HC ruled that valuation reports cannot be rejected without recording contrary findings. The authorities' reasoning that the company's loss-making status precluded share premium valuation was deemed insufficient, and the addition was accordingly deleted in the assessee's favor.
The HC upheld the ITAT's deletion of addition under section 56(2)(viib) regarding share premium collected by a closely held company. The court found that lower authorities improperly rejected the DCF valuation method without examining its details or calling for additional information. The rejection was based on objective satisfaction rather than subjective assessment of case facts. Following Town Essential Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore, 2021), the HC ruled that valuation reports cannot be rejected without recording contrary findings. The authorities' reasoning that the company's loss-making status precluded share premium valuation was deemed insufficient, and the addition was accordingly deleted in the assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.